Wednesday, June 29, 2011

International Trade: Duck-Duck-Goose


Duck-Duck-Goose
Does this children’s game sound familiar?  In this game, children sit down in a circle.  One person is “it” and walks around the circle.  As the person who is “it” walks around, they tap people's heads and designate them as "duck" or a "goose".  When someone is tapped as a "goose" they get up and chase "it" around the circle. The goal is to tag that person before they can sit in the "goose's" spot. If the goose does not tag the person before they do this, they become "it" for the next round. If the goose tags the "it" person, the person tagged has to sit in the center of the circle. Then the goose becomes “it” for the next round. The person in the middle has to stay there until another person is tagged and they are replaced.  Kids probably enjoy the game, but from an adult’s perspective, it seems like a pointless exercise of running in circles. 

So, what does this silly game have to do with international trade?  Well, think about the pending free trade agreements with South Korea, Colombia and Panama.   FTA’s are allegedly great for the U.S. economy and allow for most of the goods imported from these countries to enter the U.S. at reduced or duty-free rates.  The three new FTA’s are almost ready for Congressional approval.   Now, we have the Trade Adjustment Assistance “TAA” program that extends extra unemployment and health care benefits to workers who lose their jobs because of globalization.  Some of our government representatives have indicated they won’t support the passage of the new FTA’s unless the TAA is extended.     However, additional funds will be needed to support the benefits provided by the TAA.    It has been suggested that the additional funds should come from raising customs user fees.  User fees are generally paid on the importation of goods into the U.S. and other services performed by Customs & Border Protection officers.      Public Law 111-344 signed by the President in December 2010 already extended the collection periods in order to raise additional user fee revenues. Do you see the circle?  First, the new FTA’s reduce and/or eliminate duties on imported goods, which in turn lower the tax revenues.  Second, the extension of the TAA provides benefits to workers who lose jobs because of trade.  The TAA requires funds, which much come from somewhere.  Fourth, the government raises customs user fees to pay for the TAA expenditures. However, raising user fees will increase the costs of importations and counteract some of the savings from the new FTA’s.  So, you figure out who is the “duck,” “goose” and “it.” In the end the American public is probably stuck in the middle of the circle, while government representatives take turns playing the being the goose and “it,” chasing each other around the circle.

P.S.  What is CBP going to do with the $640 million in unobligated funds gathering dust in the user fee account?

Monday, June 27, 2011

Expensive Lesson for Sales Manager


A sales manager with PPG Industries was charged with violation of two export control laws relating to one export transaction.  The Bureau ofIndustry & Security charged the manager with a violation of15 CFR 764.2(d) Conspiracy and 15 CFR 764.2(b)  Causing, Aiding or Abetting a Violation of the Regulations.  The violations were related to the export of epoxy paint and paint thinner to a nuclear power plant under construction in Pakistan, without the required export license from the Department of Commerce.  In furtherance of the conspiracy, the manager directed another sales representative to make the order appear to be a domestic transaction to avoid internal export compliance review and arranged for the freight forwarder to transship the goods through Hong Kong.   The sales manager knew that the goods required a license and that export without a license through Hong Kong would be considered an intentional violation, which would result in fines and jail time.   The manager was ordered to pay the maximum civil penalty of $250,000 per violation, but was not ordered to serve any time in jail; however, the civil fine was reduced to $15,000, payable by an initial payment of $5,000 followed by four installments of $2,500 each. 
Moral of the Story:
Think of the consequences before you act.  You could be personally liable for payment of an export penalty.   

Friday, June 24, 2011

Did You Know....


Did you know that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement “ICE” is authorized under 19 U.S.C. 1401 to cross-designate other federal, state and local law enforcement officers to enforce customs laws?

Officers must complete a rigorous training program before the authority is granted. Once granted, the officers can enforce customs-related laws, perform searches, make arrests and perform other federal law enforcement activities such as apprehending drug smugglers and money launderers.  After completing the training course, cross designated officers are authorized to

·         execute and serve search or arrest warrants, subpoenas and summonses in compliance with customs laws;
·         conduct customs searches at the border for merchandise being imported into or exported from the U.S. and to effect seizures and arrests of persons or articles in violation of U.S law; and
·         carry firearms in compliance with the ICE firearms policy.

The cross-designation status is valid for two years.  Recertification is required after two years and the designation can be revoked by ICE at any time.

This system is more efficient because it saves gas and time while, allowing the designated officers to take action without interrupting  the workload of ICE officers.

Thursday, June 23, 2011

FATCA: It’s Not Another FTA


Seeing FATCA associated with trade, the first assumption would be that the government has another free trade agreement on the table; however, there is nothing free about this acronym.  In fact, the act was designed to generate revenue. The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act “FATCA” originally required businesses to collect tax identification numbers for vendors and submit documentation to the IRS when those vendors did more than $600 worth of business.  This turned out to be an administrative nightmare and was repealed; however, the international version of FATCA has not been repealed.

The portion of FATCA that remains will require foreign financial institutions to report certain information about financial accounts held by U.S. taxpayers to the IRS.  Starting in 2013, the foreign financial institutions will be required to

(1)  “undertake certain identification and due diligence procedures with respect to its account holders;
(2)  report annually to the IRS on its account holders who are U.S. persons or foreign entities with substantial U.S. ownership; and
(3)  withhold and pay over to the IRS 30-percent of any payments of U.S. source income, as well as gross proceeds from the sale of securities that generate U.S. source income, subject to some additional guidelines.”  

Obviously, the foreign financial institutions are not pleased with the onerous reporting requirements.  These foreign institutions are likely to start denying accounts to U.S. persons to avoid the new reporting requirements. A U.S. citizen living and/or working in Italy may have difficulty obtaining credit or a banking services if the bank is going to be required to track and report information to the IRS.   Since implementation is still over a year away, it’s always possible that the U.S. will repeal this provision of FATCA too.  

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

International Trade Acronyms

Welcome to our weekly list of acronyms used in international trade. The acronyms found here represent terms used in logistics, imports, exports, government agencies and more. This week we review acronyms that start with “N.” Please feel free to contribute additional acronyms to the list.


NAFTANorth American Free Trade Agreement
NAICSNorth American Industry Classification System
NCBFAANational Customs Brokers & Forwarders Association of America
NDANon-Disclosure  Agreement
NGONon-Governmental Organizations
NHTSANational Highway Traffic Safety Administration
NLRNo License Required
NPRMNotice of Proposed Rule Making
NTBNon-Tariff Barriers
NTCNational Targeting Center
NTEU   National Treasury Employees Union
NVOCCNon Vessel Operating Common Carrier
NTRNormal Trade Relations (formerly MFN)


Monday, June 13, 2011

Hooked on Hangers


What’s so great about hangers?    Well, we use the inexpensive plastic or metal contraptions to hang our clothing in the closet so we don’t have to pick out our work clothes out of a pile of wrinkled fabric and iron them each morning. 

Hangers must be pretty important.  Last year a U.S. importer of steel write garment hangers was arrested and charged with fraud, smuggling and other charges related to the importation of the hangers.  The “other” charges were related to an attempt to circumvent payment of customs duties by claiming the hangers were made in Mexico and subject to NAFTA.  To make matters worse, metal hangers from China are subject to antidumping duties. 

Arturo Huizar-Valazquez, admitted purchasing the hangers from Chinese companies, shipping to the U.S without the country of origin, then shipping them to Mexico where they were fraudulently labeled “Made in Mexico," and returned to the U.S.
Recently, Huizar-Velazquez was ordered to pay more than $3 million in restitution to the U.S. government and to forfeit over $4 million in proceeds gained through the illegal activities.
CBP and ICE agents worked together on this case and the punishment should serve as a warning to others who are currently violating U.S. trade laws or just thinking about ways to circumvent the system.  When you are caught, the government is going to swoop down, take your profits, demand restitution and find you a place to stay in the prison system.  

Culture Quiz Answer


We hope you enjoyed the most recent culture quiz.  Here is the question and answer from the poll.  

You are visiting a customer in Spain.  Your host takes you to a snack bar for lunch.  What do you do with your napkin, straw paper and other trash?

A.    Take it with you and dump it in the trash can outside of the restaurant.
B.     Wait for the server to remove it before leaving.
C.     Toss it on the floor.
D.    Push it to the center of the table.

Answer:  C
In Spain, the floors are swept at the end of the day and customers are expected to toss trash on the floor.